Comments for page "Extending Java Classes Using proxy"

(no title)

Thu, 05 May 2011 00:07:22 +0000

Thank you Gregg for this great article. It should become a Clojure classic.

One reason I dropped Clojure to go for Scala, after studying it for months, is because I didn't know how to extend existing Java classes using proxy. May be this is a good reason for me to pick Clojure again.

I come this this site from http://www.pragprog.com/magazines/2010-11/getting-clojure
Thanks a lot.

(no title)

Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:24:20 +0000

I am really impressed by this excellent stuff on which is a digital sculpting and painting program that has revolutionized the industry. I've enjoyed reading the nice post
curt
Nike SB Blazer High

(no title)

Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:18:12 +0000

Well, I am so excited that I have found this your post because I have been searching for some information about it almost three hours. You helped me a lot indeed and reading this your article I have found many new and useful information about this subject
curt

(no title)

Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:40:05 +0000

There's some confusion about the syntax for calling Java methods. The program listings use the correct syntax, but the section on "Clojure Syntax for Java Method Calls" says: "(method2. object1 arguments3)". That's wrong. Use "(.method2 object1 arguments3)".

The syntax for calling a Java class constructor is "(JavaClass. args)" — the classname followed by a dot is the first element.

Listing 3 fixed

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 02:59:12 +0000

John, thanks for alerting me. It should be fixed now.

So, what are you having trouble with as a Clojure programmer? I invite you (and anyone else) to write that up in a few paragraphs and submit it, either as an article or a forum topic. BTW, it'll be a *long* time before I have time to write an article like the proxy one!

Thanks again for posting! —Gregg

copy/paste error?

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 02:22:24 +0000

Hi Greg, I am really enjoying your article on proxies. It looks like there might be a copy/paste error with listing 3. It appears to be the same as listing 2. I look forward to more articles. Good stuff!